Given your time constraints and the problems you mentioned,
what I would do is the following (though possibly Michael might
recommend something else):

(a) apply to a clone of the most recent version of Sage the
changes you want (including those of M Hansen)
"manually",

(b) create a new "big" patch and attach it to 4036. (this is
the rebase). Test this on as many platforms as you can.

(c) Mention as a trac comment what you just said (you give
everything a positive review, but you added some material ...), then
replace "needs rebase" by "positive review, needs further review".
(I can't find the "legal" strings for trac tickets on
http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracGuidelines,
but it's something like this.)

(d) Email someone to ask for an immediate quick review. I can try
myself or maybe Martin Rubey or Simon King can?



On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Bill Page <bill.p...@newsynthesis.org> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4036
>
> Does not apply cleanly to recent source versions of Sage. It says:
>
> [...,needs rebase]
>
> How do I do that? It is not hard to manually fix the mismatches in the
> old patches, but what does it mean to "re-base"?
>
> The existing tests pass, but I am aware of some other issues - some of
> which I have posted to the list, including patches. And I have some
> additional code that I have added to trac. By item c) below, do you
> mean that I should accumulate all of my local changes plus Mike
> Hansen's original stuff and post the result to 4036? I could certainly
> give that a positive review since I am currently using it, but then
> isn't a review by some else also required?
>
> Actually like most people I expect, I have to admit that with my
> limited available time the rate at which Sage source code changes
> makes it hard for me to keep up. Since I want to accomplish other
> things with Sage and Axiom besides development work and no one has
> expressed much interest in the interface, this issue has just been
> pushed to the bottom of the pile until someone posts something that
> seems directly related.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Page.
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:52 PM, David Joyner <wdjoy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think roughly speaking what Michael is referring to is to ask you to:
>>
>> (a) apply the patches at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4036
>> to the latest version of Sage
>> (b) see if it applies cleanly, see if the tests pass, see if you find
>> problems in the code or docstrings. Assume for simplicity there
>> are no problems (this may be incorrect!).
>> (c) issue a new patch with your changes which replaces all the other
>> patches.
>> (d) change the subject line from "needs rebase" to
>> "positive review".
>>
>> If there are any questions, just ask on the trac ticket or on
>> sage-devel.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Bill Page <bill.p...@newsynthesis.org> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> In an email list usually it doesn't hurt much to point out the obvious
>>> ... :-) But I don't understand. Haven't I reviewed them many times
>>> here already? Perhaps I just don't understand the process... Overall
>>> there does not seem to be very much interest in the fricas package for
>>> Sage, so I haven't had much incentive to try to do more. Specifically:
>>> what can I do to help get these patches into Sage?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bill Page.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:15 PM, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 17, 8:56 am, Bill Page <bill.p...@newsynthesis.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:30 AM, luis wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <SNIP>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bill,
>>>>
>>>>> If you still have questions, please ask... And also try to encourage
>>>>> the Sage/FriCAS developers to review this ticket so that we can
>>>>> finally get it into Sage! :-)
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to point out the obvious, but since you have been using
>>>> those patches and are also familiar with Axiom why don't you review
>>>> them?
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Bill Page.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to