On Dec 30, 3:41 pm, "William Stein" <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:37 PM, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
<SNIP>
> > I have had no problem at all building ATLAS on the new sage.math
> > repeatedly. And it doesn't take "at least four hours".
>
> > Well, technically it does.
>
> I was allowing for the fact that he is running in a *virtual machine*,
> which can impact performance or tuning working at all.
Sure.
> > The tuning info is just not used since
> > there are bugs in the 3.8.x series that can be patched out.
>
> Any info on when you're going to fix ATLAS so that it doesn't take 4
> hours to build on sage.math?
Well, checking my build log reveals about 3 hours: "real
180m6.908s" :)
I had an spkg and that was deleted :( I recreated it a couple days
ago, but I am still not happy about it, but it needs some wider
testing anyway.
> William
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
