> ... paths should be considered as sequences of labeled edges, not
> vertices, as far as two vertices may be connected by differently labeled
> edges ...

I completely agree! Much of this functionality was written as a
wrapper for NetworkX a while ago, and hasn't been revisited since. I
would happily review any patch that did this, and I've made it trac
ticket #4854.

> Generally speaking, we plan to represent finite, pushdown and a new
> generalization of pushdown automata (D-Graphs) over Sage graphs,
> leveraging existing machinery.

Is there any other machinery you find missing or in need of attention?


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to