Can you give a little more detail about what you are doing? Do you have an idea as to what the main bottleneck is in your computation?
Cheers, Marshall Hampton On Dec 18, 2:52 pm, Dan <daniel.mye...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been using Sage for a fairly intense computational biology > project. I have been very pleased with the software, but when it was > finely time to run my computations I learned that my hardware was > grossly inadequate. I have since gained access to a computer cluster > (256 G5 xserves) that seems adequate to handle my need, but the > cluster manager asked about the ability of Sage to be distributed > across processors. I am writing to possibly get answers for him. The > manager and I reviewed the information about DSage, but questions > remain. Specifically, is Sage (or the modules I am using within Sage: > R, Numpy, SQLalchemy) capable of being "fully distributed", or is the > grid computing (i.e. "coarse distribution"?) the only option. > > If not, is there an alternative that can be "fully distributed"? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
