On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 at 01:22AM -0800, Craig Citro wrote: > Second: I wonder if the constructors for some of the combinatorics > functions couldn't be given a common interface. For instance: > > sage: SetPartitions > SetPartitions SetPartitionsIk SetPartitionsRk > SetPartitionsAk SetPartitionsPRk SetPartitionsSk > SetPartitionsBk SetPartitionsPk SetPartitionsTk > > sage: Ja > JackPolynomialsJ JackPolynomialsP JackPolynomialsQ JackPolynomialsQp > > Now, I've never really looked at/used the combinatorics code at all, > so if what I'm about to say is totally off-base, just ignore me.
I use the combinatorics code, and the SetPartitions* stuff bothers me. I only use the regular SetPartitions code, and think the other ones can be "put away". I like the "SetPartitionsOfType" idea. Dan -- --- Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- KAIST Department of Mathematical Sciences ------- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
