mabshoff wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> let's forget 3.2.1.alpha1 ever happened :)
> 
> 3.2.1.alpha2 fixes the build issues from its predecessor (I did a full
> build cycle before announcing here, so no need to do an alpha3 in the
> next 24 hours) and adds a couple additional patches. One very
> interesting patch set is #463 by William which will allow
> 
>  ./sage -upgrade foo.org/home/bar/sage-3.4.5.alpha2
> 
> in the future, i.e. you can upgrade to any install either via
> webserver or even by directory on a local disk. But nothing like that
> is bug free and since the infrastructure to do the in place upgrade to
> other versions isn't in anything but 3.2.1.alpha2 yet the upgrade is
> still a little rough - see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4638
> for details and a story on how to get from 3.2 to 3.2.1.alpha2 - it
> isn't for the faint of heart. Once we have 3.2.1.alpha3 it will be
> interesting to see how the upgrade from 3.2.1.alpha2 works. The
> sources are in the usual place at
> 
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/
> 
> Please build, test and report issues as usual. This release stands a
> chance to actually compile on Fedora Core 10, but we will see. No
> binary for sage.math until someone fixes #4317 :)
> 
> To our American Brethren: Happy Turkey day.
>


On Fedora 10, 32 bits all tests passed!

On Fedora 9, 32 bits the M2 issue with multi_polynomial_ideal.py.

Jaap


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to