On Nov 26, 2008, at 7:42 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Nov 26, 4:36 am, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <SNIP> > >> My only real concern is the specific statement about GPL V2 (or >> later) >> in >> what David wrote. While my test suite I'm licensing under BSD >> (which is >> stated at the top of each .sage file), I'm not a fan of GPL V3, so >> I'd >> likely license any other code under GPL V2, not GPL V2 (or later). >> It's >> my understanding that there already is code as part of Sage that's >> licensed >> that way. > > Nope, there isn't. We want GPL V2+ or compatible. If you prefer BSD > that if fine too, obviously. GPL V2 only code will not be merged in > the Sage library - we had that discussion a while back and all people > who submitted code as GPL V2 only relicensed the code as GPL V2+ or > compatible. > I thought one of the packages (Singular maybe?) was GPL V2 only or did that get changed? I remember the discussion and I knew the Sage code itself was fine. Cheers, Tim. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
