On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 08:24:57 -0700 "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> > The symbolic calculus code is currently being rewritten by myself and > Burcin Erocal at a lower level to be much faster. See > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3872 > > I handed this off to Burcin nearly three weeks ago, and he did a lot > of polish, but as far as I know hasn't posted any code. What's up Burcin!? > I was optimistically hoping this would be done and in Sage by now. > Could you at least post your code? As I had pointed out during the hand off process, I was on vacation for most of these 3 weeks with very scarce time in front of the computer and internet. I'm trying to catch up with e-mails now. I was expecting to have plenty of time to work on symbolics during this time, but things didn't work out as I expected. I will post the code I wrote before, and whatever little I could do during these days as soon as I get a hold over this catching up phase. Now that I'm back to normal life, my response time should be within reasonable limits. Feel free to ping me about things you think I should respond to. Going back to the initial topic of this thread: I share your frustration about the lack of unified interfaces to the many different sage types, though I was never brave enough to tackle any of these directly. I believe writing down your thoughts would be useful, even if no one responds. Your effort could be used once someone decides to care about these problems, and searches the archive to decide what to do about them. Cheers, Burcin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
