On Thursday 11 September 2008, parisse wrote: > > Okay, found it: > > That's the M benchmarks (the matrices are dense), could you try O1, > O2?
It turns out, here Sage/Singular is doing worse than Magma: O1 (det1) = 0.720 (MAGMA) O1 (det2) = 1.550 (MAGMA) O1 = 2.420 (MAGMA) O2 = 2.110 (MAGMA) factor = 1.180 (MAGMA) O1 (det1) = 41.457698 (Sage) O1 (det2) = 58.837056 (Sage) O1 = 78.369086 (Sage) O2 = 4.439325 (Sage) factor = ????? (didn't wait till it finished) Thanks for bringing those benchmarks to my attention, it really helps me to get an idea on how these things are supposed to behave. > (at least the det and gcd parts). > I guess you had to turn to QQ to call singular via your patch, > correct? Yep. Cheers, Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
