2008/9/3 Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, John Cremona wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, I ran into that too. I don't much like the fact that elements of
>> GF(p^n) have different types depending on whether n=1 or n>1, neither
>> type is a specialisation of the other.
>>
>> I suggest opening a ticket but making it wider, namely to unify the
>> user interfaces for the different finite field classes.
>
> I agree. There is also http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1802 and
> lots of talk at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2384
And also #2750 ...
>
>>
>> John
>>
>> 2008/9/3 Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> {{{
>>> sage: GF(241^2, 'a')(1).minpoly()
>>> x + 240
>>> sage: GF(241, 'a')(1).minpoly()
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> AttributeError Traceback (most recent call
>>> last)
>>> ...
>>> AttributeError: 'sage.rings.integer_mod.IntegerMod_int' object has no
>>> attribute 'minpoly'
>>> }}}
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
