> -1 > > I also don't like this change. It seems pretty unambiguous what I > want to do if I pass line() a list with three dimensional > coordinates. I want a 3D line. I don't really understand the > rationale for this change. > > 1. and 3. above seem like correct behavior. 2. should throw an error, > until there is a 4D plotting backed ;-). Is there more specific data > on the problem with options not being the same between 2D and 3D? > Could the options be fixed to be the same? Or to fail in a sensible > way?
The patch at #3853 will dispatch to line3d if line2d (same for point) fails. This is the same behavior as was there before. It needs to be reviewed. --Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
