On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Gary Furnish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > " > Make it so sympy also runs on top of GiNaC. This will force the creation > of a clear interface specification. > " > > If there is going to be a clear interface spec, then we should go and > make a clear interface spec so that anyone, not just GiNaC can > potentially conform to it. Perhaps this is the best long term > solution?
It will not be clear what that spec should be until 2 systems use it. In my opinion, specs should not be written by committee, but by abstracted away from an actual working solution. When Sage and Sympy can both run on top of a Pynac core, we'll see how it works and have a clear interface as a result. > My symbolics code is already GPLv2+ so fixing the headers is just a > technicality. Please do so and make an official release as a tarball or something. > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
