" Make it so sympy also runs on top of GiNaC. This will force the creation of a clear interface specification. "
If there is going to be a clear interface spec, then we should go and make a clear interface spec so that anyone, not just GiNaC can potentially conform to it. Perhaps this is the best long term solution? My symbolics code is already GPLv2+ so fixing the headers is just a technicality. On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:24 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:54 AM, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:59 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I propose that pynac be included in Sage. >>> >>> VOTE: >>> [ ] Yes, include Pynac in Sage >>> [ ] No, do not (please explain) >>> [ ] Hmm, I have questions (please ask). >> >> I have a question: what will happen to gfurnish's work? >> Is it going to be completely abandoned? > > If he clearly licenses it under GPLv2+ then hopefully it won't be, and > somebody will find ways to use it. gfurnish -- are you willing to > post a version of all your code with GPLv2+ headers? > > -- William > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
