PS e.g. see http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=800204.806298 (found
using Google Scholar): "Algebraic simplification a guide for the
perplexed" 1971, has references back to 1960 at least -- and also
mentioned Axiom.

2008/6/1 John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/6/1 Henryk Trappmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> there is an "obvious" convention that by default we mean the positive
>>> root.
>>
>> We have to distinguish between solutions of polynomials and roots.
>> Roots are clearly defined mono-valued functions:
>> z.nth_root(n)=e^(log(z)/n)
>> however this function is not continuous in z, as log is not continuous
>> at the negative real axis. This makes things complicated.
>>
>>>  It's a lot more complicated when you deal with general
>>> algebraic numbers which have several ways of being embedded into CC.
>>> Even for square roots of negative reals:  you might suggest taking the
>>> root with positive imaginary part,  but then sqrt(-2)*sqrt(-3) equals
>>> -sqrt(6) and not +sqrt(6).
>>
>> by the above definition this can easily be computed:
>> sqrt(-2)*sqrt(-3)=e^(log(-2)/2+log(-3)/2)=sqrt(6)e^(-pi*i/2-pi*i/
>> 2)=sqrt(6)*(-1)
>>
>
> You have only shifted the ambiguity to the multi-values proprty of
> log!  As I have often expleined to students, the "generic" proprty
> that log(ab)=log(a)+log(b) just does not hold as an identity for
> arbitrary complex numbers, and there is no branch convention which
> will make that true.
>
>> I never said it is simple but I am sure that there are equality
>> deciding algorithms.
>> And I really want to learn about those.
>
> If they exist, I would like to see them too.  But I am not optimistic.
>  However there must be a vast literature on the subject, which is at
> least as old as computer algebra.
>
> John
>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to