On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:44 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On May 29, 6:33 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:18 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > >> > 3.0.3.alpha0 built ok and all test passed! >> >> My 3.03.alpha0 build testing:` >> >> Fedora 8, x86_64: pass >> suse, x86_64: pass >> osx10.5 intel: pass >> ubuntu32bit: pass >> debian32bit: pass >> debian 64bit: pass >> ubuntu 64bit: pass > > So far so good :) > >> Suse, Itanium: fails; can't build clisp >> rhel5 32-bit: fail in sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx >> Fedora 8, i686: fail -- sage -t devel/sage/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py >> osx10.5 ppc: fail sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_mod2_dense.pyx >> sage -t >> devel/sage/sage/modular/abvar/homspace.py >> >> DETAILS: >> rhel5: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-3.0.3.alpha0]$ ./sage -t >> devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx >> sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx sh: line >> 1: 27584 Killed >> /home/was/build/sage-3.0.3.alpha0/local/bin/python >> /home/was/build/sage-3.0.3.alpha0/tmp/.doctest_pbori.py>/tmp/tmp-oBelX >> 2>/tmp/tmp1B3y1O >> >> A mysterious error (perphaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have >> crashed doctest. > > This is a VMWare image IIRC? How much RAM+Swap does it have?
Yes. It has a woping 256MB of RAM :-) Maybe I should increase that and report back. It has 512MB swap. >> OSX PPC: >> The new matrix mod2 code is *all wrong* there. Endianess? > > Well, all these failures are caused by different output from > A.randomize(). Does that code use cwitty's randgen? If so we have a > bug, otherwise we need to "fix" the doctests. Martin Albrecht mentioned he might be misuing the randgen framework somehow... I don't know. > >> sage -t devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_mod2_dense.pyx >> ********************************************************************** >> File "/Users/was/build/sage-3.0.3.alpha0/tmp/matrix_mod2_dense.py", line 873: >> sage: A.randomize(); A >> Expected: >> [0 0 1 1 0] >> [1 1 0 0 1] >> [1 1 1 1 0] >> [1 1 1 1 1] >> [0 0 1 1 0] >> Got: >> [0 1 0 0 1] >> [1 0 1 1 0] >> [1 1 1 1 1] >> [0 0 1 0 1] >> [0 1 1 1 0] > > <SNIP> > > >> fedora8: dsage doctesting all broken: > > *all*? I see only one test and would be curious if rerunning it fixes By "all" I meant only the testdoc.py *doctest*. Everything else works fine. > the issue. There are certainly gremlins in the DSage code somewhere, > but we need a reproducible test case. > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cicero]$ cd build/sage-3.0.3.alpha0/ >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-3.0.3.alpha0]$ ./sage -t >> devel/sage/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py >> sage -t devel/sage/sage/dsage/tests/testdoc.py >> ********************************************************************** >> File "/home/wstein/cicero/build/sage-3.0.3.alpha0/tmp/testdoc.py", line 13: >> sage: a.wait(timeout=30) > <SNIP> > > Maybe we ought to raise the timeout? Possibly. I can try that. Trying timeout=120... YES -- it works. So let's just up the timeout. The only one I increased was the one on line 13. > >> Total time for all tests: 49.5 seconds > > Cheers, > > Michael > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
