On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Nathan Dunfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oh, that's annoying, it doesn't display the Cython command line. > > Anyway, if you don't give the -p or --embed-positions option to > > Cython, then source introspection should *not* work: > > I cython'd on the command line with the -p option and then setup.py > installed. > > I now get a different error message when I try introspection: > > sage: import introtest > sage: introtest.intro?? > Error getting source: s must be a string > > instead of > > > Error getting source: arg is not a module, class, method, function, > > Does the introtest.pyx file have to copied to somewhere in particular > for this to work, or is everything supposed to embedded in the *.so > module binary? >
The binary absolutely does *not* have the source code embedded in it. I think foo?? assumes that introtest.pyx is copied somewhere in the SAGE library actually. Anyway, short answer -- source code introspection for .pyx files is *only* fully implemented for .pyx files that are part of the sage library (i.e., listed in devel/sage/setup.py). File a trac ticket to make it work in general. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
