On May 5, 7:21 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi:

Hi,

> I'm wondering if this is allowed under the GPL and if so, if that is
> what we want:
> Joe Shmoe installs SAGE on a webserver, renames it say to SmMATH, and
> charge a fee to anyone who wants to use it over the web. No indication that
> it is open source or free or anything. (Note: For example, Shmoe could
> be Wolfram.)

Yes, that is perfectly legal.

> I think the Affero license might cover 
> this.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_Licensehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affero_General_Public_License
> Should the notebook code be relicensed? Note that AGPL is compatible with
> GPLv3 but not compatible with GPLv2.

Well, since we are GPL V2+ AGPL isn't really an option. The notebook
code is already partially BSD licensed and the rest of the notebook
code will likely follow soon.

> - David Joyner

Cheers,

Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to