I WANT Sage to live. I want it to succeed. I want it to be the lingua-franca of the business so that we can all post our results "in Sage" at conferences. I want to be able to "drag and drop" your publication onto my system and have your code "just work", your documentation "just connect". I want to be able to not only use what you write, but to understand it so I can use it effectively. I want MMA and Maple users to "write for Sage" instead.
My problem is that I don't see the fundamental difference between Sage and any other system that I've touched in the past. And I don't want this whole generation of mathematicians to "do it all over again" without some fundamental gain. I may be wrong that the literate documentation is the key. And I admit I'm a knuth-boy fanatic about it. My question is, what can you suggest that will make it live when others have not? Tim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
