As someone who is much more likely to use the non-poset lattices, I could certainly live with ZLattice (that's Z as in ZZ). Would either side get to keep plain Lattice?
John 2008/4/23 Franco Saliola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We might want to think about the naming conventions for Lattice. As > > with all words in mathematics, this one has multiple meanings. A > > lattice can be a poset with a meet and a join, or it can be a free > > abelian group with an inner product. > > This is a good point. The only thing I can think of is to append > something: for example, LatticeGroup. I'm not sure how natural that > is. LatticePoset is definitely not. Other suggestions? > > > > -- > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
