On Apr 22, 9:41 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 21, 2008, at 11:34 AM, mabshoff wrote: <SNIP> > > The number of bundles in trac is rather small and most of those > > bundles either have review issues or shouldn't be bundles in the first > > place [as you stated above], so applying them to a pre-3.0 tree, > > extracting the patch and so on should be doable. > > Did you still want me to do this, or is this a non-issue now that 3.0 > is officially released?
Sure, let's do it. So far only an informal announcement to sage-devel is out [aside from the big, fat reference on sagemath.org], but since we have to update HISTORY.txt as well as fix some small issue in the scripts repo it is something that can be done now. It won't make a difference for users, the inconvenience for developers will be small, i.e. we can keep an old style 3.0 around and rebase on that tree. Since 3.0.1 will see "bug fixes only" it seems like the perfect time to do so. > - Robert Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
