On Apr 6, 2008, at 22:29 , mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks, > > this is Sage 3.0.alpha2. Up to now we closed 111 tickets. But > things are still of alpha quality:
> Sources and binaries are in the usual place: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.0/sage-3.0.alpha2.tar 10.5.2 (Dual Quad Xeon, "-j6") Build succeeded, test had 1 failure (the known prandom problem): real 82m35.203s user 73m5.825s sys 23m21.640s ... SAGE build/upgrade complete! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/prandom.py Total time for all tests: 3236.6 seconds The detail: ********************************************************************** sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/prandom.py File "/Users/tmp/sage-3.0.alpha2/tmp/prandom.py", line 241: sage: [gauss(0, 100) for i in range(3)] Expected: [24.916051749154448, -62.992720615792727, -8.1993122536718097] Got: [24.916051749154448, -62.992720615792727, -8.1993122536718115] ********************************************************************** 1 items had failures: 1 of 4 in __main__.example_13 ***Test Failed*** 1 failures. For whitespace errors, see the file /Users/tmp/sage-3.0.alpha2/ tmp/.doctest_prandom.py [4.4 s] 10.4.11 (Core 2 Duo, "-j2"): Build failed, as others have seen. Full log is at sage.math.washington.edu:~justin/logs/3.0.A2.install.log should you want to check it. -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds -------- If you're not confused, You're not paying attention -------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
