Yes, that's a bug. It is passing the residue to the base class, which doesn't handle it. So I simply removed it from the super().__init__() call in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/40651.
Best, Travis On Wednesday, August 20, 2025 at 4:16:36 PM UTC+9 axio...@yahoo.de wrote: > I am guessing that this is a bug. Can anybody confirm? > > sage: T = > StandardTableau([[1,2,3],[4,5]]).residue_sequence(3).standard_tableaux() > sage: T.base_ring() > 3-residue sequence (0,1,2,2,0) with multicharge (0) > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/c8fd352c-de5f-46b4-b6d8-c29807a40c10n%40googlegroups.com.
