On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 at 7:51:19 PM UTC+9 tobia...@gmx.de wrote: > I suggest to make the checks information only; the check report failed step, but the check itself passes always.
I don't think this is a good idea. If some tests fail randomly, then that's an issue with the test and not with the "engine". Just fix the test or, if that's too much work for now, disable it. Certainly there is an issue somewhere in code, but the doctest is not to blame. The engine ( "Build & Test using Conda(Meson) / Conda") itself is not faulty either. Fixing the root cause of the unfortunate situation seems too much work for now. PR authors and reviewers is bearing the harm by the unfortunate situation. My suggestion is to minimize it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/d7c814ea-951f-4361-9048-8affc0485fecn%40googlegroups.com.
