Georgi,

Also, you can browse all of the currently 5006 open "plans" for Sage here:

https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues

 -- William

On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 7:07 AM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 3 January 2025 03:00:20 GMT-05:00, Georgi Guninski <ggunin...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >In sage 10.4, I can prove $-1 = -oo$ and I am concerned about citing
> >CAS with this inconsistency.
> >
> >Are there plans to try to reduce the inner inconsistencies in sage?
> >
> >sage: Kx.<x>=QQ[];f=Kx(0);f.degree()
> >-1
> >sage: gp(f).poldegree()
> >-oo
>
>
> All you see here is gp taking a less standard choice of deg(0).
>
> It's hardly an inner Sage's inconsistency.
>
>
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/3CD656F5-63F3-4650-8967-CC792EDD8F7B%40gmail.com
> .
>


-- 
William (http://wstein.org)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CACLE5GCCmPKUvdgrQ1orfGFXh0_KCd7TGbTTV5rFeAJDkhrtpw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to