Georgi, Also, you can browse all of the currently 5006 open "plans" for Sage here:
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues -- William On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 7:07 AM Dima Pasechnik <dimp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 3 January 2025 03:00:20 GMT-05:00, Georgi Guninski <ggunin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >In sage 10.4, I can prove $-1 = -oo$ and I am concerned about citing > >CAS with this inconsistency. > > > >Are there plans to try to reduce the inner inconsistencies in sage? > > > >sage: Kx.<x>=QQ[];f=Kx(0);f.degree() > >-1 > >sage: gp(f).poldegree() > >-oo > > > All you see here is gp taking a less standard choice of deg(0). > > It's hardly an inner Sage's inconsistency. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/3CD656F5-63F3-4650-8967-CC792EDD8F7B%40gmail.com > . > -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CACLE5GCCmPKUvdgrQ1orfGFXh0_KCd7TGbTTV5rFeAJDkhrtpw%40mail.gmail.com.
