On 01/04/2008, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes. We're making good progress on the new coercion model (David Roe > and I were working on it last night, he finished Rings), but it is > not 3.0 material (both for timing and stability reasons). > Thanks for the explanation.
> To find out what the "new coercion model" is see http:// > wiki.sagemath.org/days7/coercion . It is orthogonal to most > development but I think you in particular keep hearing a lot about it > because it was created to address exactly the kinds of concerns and > annoyances with Sage that you so often bring up :). Who, me? Also, if someone > proposes doing something that is a complete reduplication of work > that either has been done (or is rendered unnecessary) by the > coercion fixes I try and point that out. That is useful. I have some code almost ready to go which might well fit into that category. John > > > - Robert > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
