On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Sage motivation is to create a viable alternative to Ma*. > > There are also people, who don't need an alternative to Ma*, but > rather a good library, read for example this email from Gael: > > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/msg/f8f497d1d32fab30 > > who works on Mayavi2 (yet we have paraview3, that imho is more mature, > but it's a beast). > > What are your opinions - can Sage become (in a year, or two) in > something like Gael (and me) want?
I very much hope and strongly encourage that technology developed in the context of Sage will turn into the sorts of thing you want, even if that isn't the current stated aim of the Sage project. For example, the great work Tim Abbot has done on debianization of Sage helps a huge amount and I'm extremely supportive of that. And I strongly agree with Gary Furnish's answer to your email above. William > > Basically, I think we need a modular calculus package, that interacts > well with other python scientific packages. > > Ondrej > > P.S. I am looking forward to Garry's calculus patch. :) > > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
