On Thursday, May 2, 2024 at 12:37:44 AM UTC+9 Nils Bruin wrote:
Working on *why* it might be so slow a bit:
%prun for i in range(100r): f(0.1)
798103 function calls (791903 primitive calls) in 1.327 seconds
Impressive. Thanks.
so, most stuff is happening in maxima and in _subs_, and somehow random
elements of an intervalfield are needed ...
I don't think the design was primarily focused on numerical evaluation
speed but rather on having symbolic piecewise functions.
I wonder if they, maintainers of maxima, would regard this as a bug...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/4cc8f012-c573-4e4e-917d-afb231fbdc8dn%40googlegroups.com.
