-1 For the most part, because this proposed policy cannot be reflected in the GitHub user interface: The list of selectable labels in the drop down menu cannot depend on whether it's an Issue or a PR.
Matthias On Tuesday, February 27, 2024 at 10:45:03 PM UTC-8 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Hi, > > Here I withdraw the early premature "giving up" on my recent proposal, > since afterwards there were some positive comments. Hence I open a voting > for > > Proposal: > > 1. Do not use "blocker" label for Issues, as "blocker" means to delay the > release. > 2. Instead use "critical" label for a very serious and urgent Issue. > 3. A PR fixing the "critical" Issue will likely get the "blocker" label. > 4. Old Issues converted from trac with "critical" label will get the > "major" label instead. > > Voting will end when there is no new vote for a week. > > This is a simple majority voting (following the standard on sage-devel > proposal)! > > A positive vote is for all parts of the Proposal. So if you do not like > any of (1) -- (4), cast a negative vote (-1). > > > Happy voting! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/4c3cb94a-10b2-470b-9e42-0661548f4f67n%40googlegroups.com.
