Note that posting a proposal here on sage-devel to make the packages standard followed the policies of our project. "optional packages stay in that status for at least a year, after which they can be proposed to be included as standard packages in Sage. For this a GitHub PR is opened with the label c: packages: standard. Then make a proposal in the Google Group sage-devel." https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/packaging.html#inclusion-procedure-for-new-and-updated-packages
Multicasting "negative reviews" to tickets is not part of the procedures of our project; cf. https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/36726#issuecomment-1820148873 on the emergence of this idea. On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 4:34:12 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On 16 February 2024 23:33:48 GMT, Matthias Koeppe <matthia...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 1:25:13 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > >>On Friday, February 16, 2024 at 9:38:16 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >My vote for is conditional on them remaining pip packages, and that's not > >what your PRs do. > > > > > >I'll count that as 0. > > you can count that as negative reviews on your PRs > as they are now. > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/9151514d-395e-437c-ac65-b61dbfcd0ddbn%40googlegroups.com.
