Appointing an editor is not supposed to be part of normal review. This is for the (hopefully rare) cases where we, the community, horribly failed in the code review process and for whatever reason no consensus can be found among the issue participants. The code review should have been a cooperative group decisions of the issue participants.
If anyone thinks they can game the system by being a general nuisance and starting review wars in every issue to force editor decisions, then I'd encourage them to rethink their approach. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/dd1261c7-4bcc-40cb-9c45-ee77adfde077n%40googlegroups.com.
