Hi, We spent six days for the preliminary discussion in the sage-devel thread
https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/OUnoroIf0qc about choosing the keyword triggering block-scoped optional tag needed in https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35750 We now start the voting with the four candidates (A), (B), (C), (D). The voting will end 7th July 23:59 KST (Korea Standard Time). During the voting, discussions can continue in the linked places but please only your vote (and, if you will, short comment) to this thread. (A) "needs" sage: # needs sage.rings.number_field sage: QQbar(I)^2 -1 sage: QQbar(I)^1000000000 # long time 1 sage: # needs sage.rings.finite_rings sage: F = GF(7) sage: F(1) + QQbar(1) # needs sage.rings.number_field ... (B) "requires" sage: # requires sage.rings.number_field sage: QQbar(I)^2 -1 sage: QQbar(I)^1000000000 # long time 1 sage: # requires sage.rings.finite_rings sage: F = GF(7) sage: F(1) + QQbar(1) # requires sage.rings.number_field ... (C) "uses" sage: # uses sage.rings.number_field sage: QQbar(I)^2 -1 sage: QQbar(I)^1000000000 # long time 1 sage: # uses sage.rings.finite_rings sage: F = GF(7) sage: F(1) + QQbar(1) # uses sage.rings.number_field ... (D) "standard" sage: # use standard feature - sage.rings.number_field sage: QQbar(I)^2 -1 sage: QQbar(I)^1000000000 # long time 1 sage: # use standard feature - sage.rings.finite_rings sage: F = GF(7) sage: F(1) + QQbar(1) # standard - sage.rings.number_field ... Please just focus on the keyword. Don't worry about minor details or punctuations: the keyword would be recognized, the rest would be ignored noise, in the implementation. Thanks for your attention. Happy voting :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/e3471d65-0652-4173-8eab-f5b45888c4d9n%40googlegroups.com.
