On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 8:39:50 PM UTC-7 Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > The downside (that will always remain to me) with GH/GL is anything with > their web interface is highly decentralized, >
No, no such thing. > whereas with trac, things are highly concentrated on tickets, which are a > single point of reference. Using the GH/GL model, we have all of these forks > Irrelevant because in the proposed workflow you never look at another developer's fork. (which we have to tell newbies are not the same as branches and should not > be used as such). > There is also more manual things we have to type and sync subject to human > (typo) error. This is likely manageable to me compared to some of the other > benefits (although I will personally experience none of those). Despite > this, I still have reservations about the increased pains of development > from trying to fit a mostly square peg into a round hole, and subsequently > am still opposed to the move > Sorry, this is just a rant based on nothing -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/400b8ce4-630f-49cc-acee-d654ff0b3d4en%40googlegroups.com.
