On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 4:43 PM davida...@gmail.com <davidayott...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I believe that the functionalities given by the method _element_constructor_ > should be at least mentioned in the main docstring of the Parent. > > For example, when typing: > > sage: QQ? > > Then, the ouput explains to the user how to construct a rational number. This > is how I always used Sage. The documentation of _element_constructor_ would > be there for the developers that need to understand and modify it.
Well, _things are internal, and not required to be documented. > > Le vendredi 9 septembre 2022 à 05:16:27 UTC-4, axio...@yahoo.de a écrit : >> >> Dear all, >> >> as a user, how am I supposed to access the docstring of an >> _element_constructor_? >> >> For example, >> >> sage: P.<x> = QQ[] >> sage: P? >> >> does not give me any hint about the various ways to construct a polynomial. >> >> If this is not possible other than "R._element_constructor_?", then, as >> developers, how should we make this documentation accessible? >> >> Martin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/ecf3daf3-0050-4255-84cc-472881a37e0en%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq19hRHeVNVYfgSchQ3DY2PRnQP427ykHoo2H0tuPvrCiQ%40mail.gmail.com.
