PS: there are probably some things that have to be replaced. For example, LazyPowerSeriesRing has methods `sum_generator` and `product_generator`, which are undocumented but seem to compute the sum/product of a sequence of series where the n-th series (-1 in the product case) has valuation at least n.
Martin On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 09:17:30 UTC+2 Martin R wrote: > That's a misunderstanding: I am NOT attached to the name > LazyTaylorSeries(Ring). > > I would prefer that the ticket goes in with the name we agree on, rather > than going in with a name that we deprecate in the same release. > > Moreover, I do not know whether there will be a conflict with the > LazyPowerSeries(Ring) in the species directory, and I am somewhat unwilling > to find out, because that code seems to have a few bugs and will be > replaced anyway. > On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 06:35:56 UTC+2 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > >> On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 9:04:00 AM UTC+9 Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >> >>> the power series "is" a function (well, formally), we just usually >>> think of it as being equal to an "easier" function. >>> >> >> No. You know that a power series is an expression. It has variables, but >> not domain and codomain. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/dee4d001-a06a-4bc6-956b-318738fc5932n%40googlegroups.com.