PS: there are probably some things that have to be replaced.  For example, 
LazyPowerSeriesRing has methods `sum_generator` and `product_generator`, 
which are undocumented but seem to compute the sum/product of a sequence of 
series where the n-th series (-1 in the product case) has valuation at 
least n.

Martin

On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 09:17:30 UTC+2 Martin R wrote:

> That's a misunderstanding: I am NOT attached to the name 
> LazyTaylorSeries(Ring).
>
> I would prefer that the ticket goes in with the name we agree on, rather 
> than going in with a name that we deprecate in the same release.
>
> Moreover, I do not know whether there will be a conflict with the 
> LazyPowerSeries(Ring) in the species directory, and I am somewhat unwilling 
> to find out, because that code seems to have a few bugs and will be 
> replaced anyway.
> On Tuesday, 16 August 2022 at 06:35:56 UTC+2 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 9:04:00 AM UTC+9 Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>>
>>>  the power series "is" a function (well, formally), we just usually 
>>> think of it as being equal to an "easier" function.
>>>
>>
>> No. You know that a power series is an expression. It has variables, but 
>> not domain and codomain. 
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/dee4d001-a06a-4bc6-956b-318738fc5932n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to