On 2 Mrz., 04:17, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like discussion > on:http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2232http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2170 > I made comments in both of those last tickets. I think the first is invalid
I don't think so! (Ok, i reported this bug, so maybe i'm not objective enough ;-) I posted a comment to your comment on #2232, but i will repeat it here: You're right that you should use ".str" if you just want to get the string representation of a number in a given base. But the digits function can do more. It can take any indexable object as source for the digits. So i think this is really a bug which should be fixed, because since sage: 1.digits(11,'pleasefixme') ['l'] this sage: 0.digits(11,'pleasefixme') should return ['p'] (what it currently does not! It returns [] ) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
