On 9.6.rc0, I am not able to reproduce the issue. The command
`view(Poset((SetPartitions(4), lambda A,B: A in B.refinements())))` produce
a nice looking picture level by level.
Sébastien
On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 3:17:11 AM UTC+2 Trevor Karn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have tried to create a nice image of a Hasse diagram (of the set
> partitions of {1,2,3,4}) using the command `view(Poset((SetPartitions(4),
> lambda A,B: A in B.refinements())))`
> as suggested in these notes by Mike Zabrocki
> <https://garsia.math.yorku.ca/~zabrocki/math4160f19/notes/ch7_mobius_inversion.pdf>
> .
>
> However, when I try, things come out looking a bit messy (image attached).
> The problem doesn't seem to be with the latex compiler on my end, since
> (e.g.) the complete bipartite graph comes out looking just fine using
> `view(graphs.CompleteBipartiteGraph(*3*,*3*))`.
>
> Does this seem like a bug, or are there some configurations wrong on my
> end?
>
> Thanks,
> Trevor
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/b7bf3ffd-383d-45a5-93bf-31ac274c4cc2n%40googlegroups.com.
