lazy_import is most likely imported into sage.all by accident.
On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 8:23:15 AM UTC-7 davida...@gmail.com wrote: > Thank you both for your suggestions, here's the ticket: > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33602 > > Also, do we want the name "lazy_import" in the global namespace? In the > developer's manual it says that it should not, see > https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/coding_in_python.html#deprecation, > but maybe these instructions are little bit outdated. > > Le mardi 29 mars 2022 à 23:36:03 UTC-4, Matthias Koeppe a écrit : > >> When you open a ticket, please add it to >> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25383 (Meta-ticket: deprecate useless >> or misleading functions in the global namespace >> <https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25383>) >> >> On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 7:59:51 PM UTC-7 Travis Scrimshaw wrote: >> >>> I don't think such classes were meant to get into the public namespace >>> as they are not so useful (such as promoting a polynomial to a power >>> series). Indeed, as you say, these classes should not be created directly >>> (as they do not have a redirect to pass data to a parent; cf. >>> SemistandardTableau). >>> >>> Please open a trac ticket for this (you can cc me on it with "tscrim" in >>> the cc field). If you can also push a fix (the top-level imports will also >>> need to be deprecated), that would be appreciated too. >>> >>> Best, >>> Travis >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 10:12:57 PM UTC+9 davida...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello everybody, >>>> >>>> During my normal uses of SageMath, I observed that the class >>>> "PowerSeries" appears in the TAB completion: >>>> >>>> sage: PowerSeries[TAB] >>>> PowerSeries >>>> PowerSeriesRing >>>> >>>> However this is the base class for the elements of a PowerSeriesRing >>>> and the docstring explicitly states that it is not for public use: >>>> >>>> sage: PowerSeries? >>>> Docstring: >>>> A power series. Base class of univariate and multivariate power >>>> series. The following methods are available with both types of >>>> objects. >>>> Init docstring: >>>> Initialize a power series. *Not for public use.* It gets called >>>> by >>>> the "PowerSeries_poly" and "MPowerSeries" constructors. >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> I am not as experimented as some of you in SageMath development so >>>> before creating a trac ticket about this I wanted to know if this is >>>> intentional? From my understanding, when implementing a new parent/element >>>> framework, one should not instanciate directly the element class but use >>>> the parent's element constructor instead (or other related method). >>>> >>>> It is the same story with the classes "PuiseuxSeries" and >>>> "LaurentSeries" which are the element classes of "PuiseuxSeriesRing" and >>>> "LaurentSeriesRing" respectively. Are there times where someone would want >>>> to use these directly? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/7553ae97-ad75-4882-8648-a9f1c08a2f83n%40googlegroups.com.
