Sorry, I did not find anything about this in the docs for Sets (but I should have tried the operators for Python sets).
Guillermo On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 20:25, Matthias Koeppe <matthiaskoe...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 on this; as Sébastien says, we already have overloaded the bitwise > operators &, | for this -- which is consistent with Python's operators for > set and frozenset - https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#set > (Note Python's set and frozenset do not support +.) > > On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 2:34:14 AM UTC-7 GMS wrote: > >> >> I have noticed the overloading of + for Set union, which I find very >> convenient. >> >> Correspondingly, I would like to propose the overloading of * for Set >> intersection. >> >> It seems to me that it suffices to modify >> local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/sage/sets/set.py >> by adding in >> class Set_add_sub_operators: >> the lines >> def _mul_(self, X): >> """ >> Return the intersection of ``self`` and ``X``. >> """ >> return self.intersection(X) >> >> I have tested this and it works as expected. >> >> Should I open a ticket? I shall have to learn how to deal with commits. >> >> I am aware of the overloading of * in real_set.py, but I think they are >> compatible. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Guillermo >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CANnG188HOjcZGoNGwThmCOySamJ9yTbKtg7meB5oR1%2B5Jmg8xQ%40mail.gmail.com.
