Indeed it was on 9.4. Sorry I forgot to mention that. Thank you. On Friday, February 18, 2022 at 9:31:06 PM UTC+1 jus...@mac.com wrote:
> > > > On Feb 18, 2022, at 12:23 , David Roe <roed...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This should have been fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32602. > > It was reported fixed for 9.5, and Volker’s release message for 9.5.beta6 > indicates it was included then. And it does not fail for sage 9.5 on my > system. > > Simon may let us know what config he’s using. > > Justin > > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:58 PM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-devel < > sage-...@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 18, 2022, at 08:09 , Simon Brandhorst <sbran...@web.de> wrote: > > > > > > ``` > > > sage: any([magma(True),magma(True)]) > > > Fatal Python error: _Py_CheckRecursiveCall: Cannot recover from stack > overflow. > > > Python runtime state: initialized > > > > > > Thread 0x00007f7b15e34700 (most recent call first): > > > ``` > > > Can anyone reproduce? > > > > This works for me with Sage 9.5 on macOS 10.13.6 (built from scratch). > By “works”, I mean I get “True” as a result. > > The same holds for sage 8.[3-9]. > > > > However, with 9.[0-4], I get the same error you report: a stack > explosion, ending with SIGABRT. > > > > HTH > > > > Justin > > -- > Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large > Director > Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income > -- > In mathematics you don't understand > things. You just get used to them. > --John von Neumann > -- > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/d1b99696-db5e-443b-a7ec-10e3c69fa4afn%40googlegroups.com.
