On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 5:00 PM 'Peter Taylor' via sage-devel <sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > "sum" is not specific enough a keyword to filter down the discussions. None > of the titles of the "Mathematically incorrect answers" list on Trac are > obviously about this issue, but is it new? > > Code: > > s, n, x, y, t = var('s, n, x, y, t') > print(sum(binomial(n,s) * (x+y)^s * x^(n-s), s, 0, n)) > print(sum(binomial(n,s) * (x+1)^s * x^(n-s), s, 0, n))
This looks like a Maxima bug: sage: SR(binomial(n,s) * (x+1)^s * x^(n-s)).sum( s, 0, n, algorithm='giac') # correct x^n*e^(n*log(2*x + 1) - n*log(x)) sage: SR(binomial(n,s) * (x+1)^s * x^(n-s)).sum( s, 0, n) # wrong (actually, maxima is the default) (2*x)^n sage: SR(binomial(n,s) * (x+1)^s * x^(n-s)).sum( s, 0, n, algorithm='maxima') # wrong (2*x)^n (this is with Sage 9.6.beta0) > > Observed in version 9.4 using sagecell.sagemath.org: > > (2*x + y)^n > (2*x)^n > > Expected: > > (2*x + y)^n > (2*x + 1)^n > > Link to reproduce: > https://sagecell.sagemath.org/?z=eJyFjEEKg0AQBO-Cf-ibM2Yi-gC_IqxBwkJ2Ijsq6-9dghcPklM3TVWbe09N8PZqRqc6xTOIy6IsTKCCJNgFC3psLlJ1GasfN0evC9kaaPT6Dd59SMUYNSg9dh4stzSQPo0F2W_zBfMfr7vzDlIMMqI=&lang=sage&interacts=eJyLjgUAARUAuQ== > > Regards, > Peter Taylor > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/5936f5ad-848e-46bc-b123-8f521b61c4edn%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq35PJCx%2BCgVbPro7mnH5FzTA%3D%3D0LF%2Bdtty3ccbgAC9inw%40mail.gmail.com.