Yes, this is the intended behaviour. If you don't like it, then, as a
workaround, you could try to clear the variable called
"sage_configurable_latex_macros". YMMV, but this works for me in a fresh
sage session:
sage: from sage.misc.latex_macros import sage_configurable_latex_macros
sage: global sage_configurable_latex_macros
sage:
sage_configurable_latex_macros.remove("\\newcommand{\\Bold}[1]{\\mathbf{#1}}")
If I now type "html(x)", then the result is "<html>\[x\]</html>", instead
of "<html>\[\newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}x\]</html>".
If that gives errors due to a bad definition of "\\Bold", then maybe you
should also do:
sage:
sage_configurable_latex_macros.append("\\renewcommand{\\Bold}[1]{\\mathbf{#1}}")
On Sunday, December 19, 2021 at 7:34:13 AM UTC-7 AlbertHilb wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I noted every command LaTeX output is prefaced by the definition of a
> \Bold newcommand even if the \Bold command is not really used in the
> output.
> For example, if I type "1" and press return I get
>
> \newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}1
>
> Is this intended?
>
> Among other things, the presence of the newcommand definition prevent me
> from using KaTeX as LaTeX renderer because it complains \Bold command
> already exists and \renewcommand should be used to redefine it.
>
> I use SageMath 9.4 binary for Ubuntu 20.04 64 bit with jupyterlab 3.2.4 as
> frontend.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/d11dda6a-0d10-4b68-a2ea-edcba6043ddan%40googlegroups.com.
