> > As to the question of replacing backends, there is already a ticket (which > I cannot find right now, my apologies) which started the process of seeing > what doctests would fail if we went to Sympy as default. Presumably > something similar could be done with this engine (I don't know if it is > more for low-level symbolics or also things like integration). >
In particular, the (very minimal) documentation (really an API is all) makes it seems more a replacement for things like Ginac (already in C++), not Maxima et al. I don't know if that would provide a noticeable speedup per se, though the SageManifolds ticket mentioned parallelization so perhaps it is better suited for that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/9fcfa938-687b-41dd-8db9-96acad2e9141n%40googlegroups.com.
