> On 7/12/2020, at 10:25 PM, Antonio Rojas <nqn7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> El lunes, 7 de diciembre de 2020 a las 6:11:31 UTC+1, Matthias Koeppe
> escribió:
> In https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30315 I propose to make jmol optional. To
> my understanding it has been replaced by generally better options such as
> threejs and jsmol. But it's possible that I'm missing something.
>
> The Javascript version of it, previously installed as part of jmol, is
> switched on this ticket to come from the pip-installable package
> jupyter-jsmol.
>
> Is there any reason for not making jsmol optional too? Isn't three.js the
> default renderer these days?
>
three.js still cannot be used to build the doc as far as understand.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/3BE950C9-0F6F-41EE-AC64-2B636DA04F0D%40gmail.com.
