A .gitattributes file was introduced 
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29733 that enforces this CRLF to LF 
conversion

Le dimanche 8 novembre 2020 à 14:17:41 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :

> and this seems to be due to automatic replacement of CRLF by LF 
>
> warning: CRLF will be replaced by LF in 
> build/pkgs/planarity/patches/extern.patch.
> The file will have its original line endings in your working directory.
> Le dimanche 8 novembre 2020 à 14:09:28 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>
>> artifact complains about our patches not applying:
>>
>> [planarity-3.0.0.5.p0] patching file c/planarity.h
>> [planarity-3.0.0.5.p0] Hunk #1 FAILED at 77 (different line endings).
>> [planarity-3.0.0.5.p0] Hunk #2 FAILED at 88 (different line endings).
>> [planarity-3.0.0.5.p0] 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file 
>> c/planarity.h.rej
>> [givaro-4.1.1] Making all in gmp++
>> [planarity-3.0.0.5.p0] Error applying '../patches/extern.patch'
>>
>> Le dimanche 8 novembre 2020 à 13:56:53 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>>
>>> The 9.3.beta1 build on gitlab is blocked by a failure with "planarity"
>>>
>>> see 
>>> https://gitlab.com/sagemath/dev/trac/-/pipelines/213154052
>>> Le jeudi 5 novembre 2020 à 11:06:28 UTC+1, Sébastien Labbé a écrit :
>>>
>>>> At
>>>> https://hub.docker.com/r/sagemath/sagemath-dev/tags
>>>> tags are still 4 months old.
>>>>
>>>> I notice that #30736 is in 9.3.beta0 but not #30820 yet. This should be 
>>>> fixed automatically if #30820 is in the next beta?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, October 25, 2020 at 8:25:46 PM UTC+1 Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Could some please review https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30820 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe also relevant : https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30736 (already 
>>>>> positive review)
>>>>>
>>>>> Le samedi 24 octobre 2020 à 09:59:00 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have made https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30820 for some small 
>>>>>> fixes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le samedi 24 octobre 2020 à 09:20:17 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a 
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can see recent tentatives from Orsay, but they failed. Maybe Erik 
>>>>>>> did launch a runner there ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our .ci setting needs to be adapted to use python3 by default. And 
>>>>>>> there is a complaint about
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .ci/build-docker.sh: line 60: syntax error: unterminated quoted 
>>>>>>> string
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but the script looks ok to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le vendredi 23 octobre 2020 à 20:42:26 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a 
>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It seems that all pipelines are failing since 9.2.beta4. Could 
>>>>>>>> someone please have a look ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://gitlab.com/sagemath/sage/-/pipelines
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le jeudi 15 octobre 2020 à 12:09:15 UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bonjour,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Vincent, I learned recently how to use continuous 
>>>>>>>>> integration in gitlab and the docker images of previous versions of 
>>>>>>>>> sage 
>>>>>>>>> posted https://hub.docker.com/r/sagemath/sagemath-dev/ in order 
>>>>>>>>> to test that my optional package works with all those versions. It 
>>>>>>>>> basically made me realize that my package was broken on most versions 
>>>>>>>>> of 
>>>>>>>>> sage except the most recent. And hopefully soon, I will be able to 
>>>>>>>>> fix 
>>>>>>>>> those issues. So thanks to those involved in having these various 
>>>>>>>>> docker 
>>>>>>>>> images available.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the curious, the most recent run is available here:
>>>>>>>>> https://gitlab.com/seblabbe/slabbe/-/pipelines/202932270
>>>>>>>>> it shows that my package works for 9.1.rc5 but not 9.0 or earlier 
>>>>>>>>> versions (I need to work on it).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, it seems the docker images of various versions of 
>>>>>>>>> sage are not uploaded since 4 months. Maybe it was too much energy to 
>>>>>>>>> upload all beta versions there. In fact, I don't really need all beta 
>>>>>>>>> in 
>>>>>>>>> there. What I think is important to have are the final releases. With 
>>>>>>>>> that 
>>>>>>>>> respect, the following are missing:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 8.6: ok
>>>>>>>>> 8.7: ok
>>>>>>>>> 8.8: ok
>>>>>>>>> 8.9 is missing or is broken
>>>>>>>>> 9.0 : ok
>>>>>>>>> 9.1 is missing (so I am using 9.1.rc5 and 9.1.rc5-py3)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No 9.2.betaX are there, but I would be happy that 9.2 be there 
>>>>>>>>> when released.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks to the people involved.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sébastien
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/9818282b-b1df-4fab-b771-eda47748e5ddn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to