Hello, On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:57:49 +0100 Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mabshoff wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 28, 11:45 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> mabshoff wrote: > > > >>> which Maple release are you running? > >> Me, once again. I don't think it is important which version > >> of Maple is installed (if any!) for the test of interfaces/maple.py! > > > > I do believe that it is important since various people doctested this > > before it was merged. I don't know if we plan to restrict the Maple > > interface to certain releases of Maple. I had checked the examples on Maple 10. I also have access to 9.5, and it gives similar results to what Jaap is getting. Should we consider supporting different versions of Maple? Can anybody, who's familiar with Maple, suggest a more consistent command to print things out in Maple? > Ok, maybe someone can explain why the tests fail on a computer > with no maple installed :-)! You're right, the tests should have the optional keyword, so they are not always checked. I was fooled by the tests in the beginning of the file, which don't specify the keyword explicitly. Now I understand that they don't have to, because the docstring has the words "optional", "package" and "installed." Burcin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
