On Jan 22, 8:36 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 22, 8:04 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Francois,
> dortmund.de> wrote:
> > > On the funny side of things my regular copy fails the calculus.py
> > > test
> > > because it takes too much time, my ebuild one passes it without
> > > problem.
>
> > Ok, that is odd. Does it timeout or hang?
>
> Timeout:
> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/calculus/calculus.py *** ***
> Error: TIMED OUT! *** ***
> *** *** Error: TIMED OUT! *** ***
> [182.4 s]
That is very odd. Can you run that test with -verbose and post a link
to the result somewhere? I wouldn't be surprised if clisp choked on
some optimization flags, but that is speculation at this point.
> OF course the ebuild one may have some extra optimizations from
> the Gentoo C(XX)FLAGS that I didn't kill and the test is run by root
> and not a regular user.
>
> For BLAS I use ATLAS-3.8.0 I don't think there is any differences
> between the sources used by Gentoo and sage (tell me if I am
> wrong) you have the Gentoo patch and we also have the
> pentium-M patch. The only difference I can think of is one was
> compiled by gfortran and the other by g95.
Well, even playing with CFLAGS can change the results even so
slightly.
> Cheers,
> Francois
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
