On Dec 7, 10:08 am, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 3:07 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill,
I will write that test program you asked for in the next couple hours.
The sparc box is 64 bit, I am just compiling in 32 bit mode. If I find
some time I will build in 64 bit mode, but then I need to build all
dependencies in 64 bit, too, so that would take a while.
>
> > On my 32-bit x86 Debian testing Linux box, looking at install.log, one
> > test failed:
> > Testing _fmpz_poly_max_bits1()... FAIL!
> > (All other FLINT tests passed. The build is still running, so I don't
> > know whether Sage doctests will pass.) Let me know if you want more
> > information.
>
> Hmm, this is an x86 machine. If it fails on this machine, I am now
> thinking I have a bug in the code rather than it being some kind of
> build problem. Perhaps this is what is happening on Michael's SPARC32.
> I better check my code.
>
> The problem is more than likely going to be in the test code itself.
> I'll check it over with a fine tooth comb and see if I can find
> something wrong.
>
I believe so, too. Especially since we both had the failure with gcc
4.2.x.
> Bill.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
