On Oct 30, 6:29 pm, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 30, 1:48 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > This is due to the inplace operator stuff using refcounts to > > determine if it's safe to mutate. The simple workaround is to not use > > numpy arrays of SAGE objects. Another question is why would one do so > > (i.e. what is lacking in the SAGE linear algebra types?) I think the > > benifits of inplace operators in terms of performance are to great to > > abandon, but am at loss to find a clean solution so that external > > extension classes don't mess them up... other than perhaps a global > > option that can be enabled/disabled.
I've opened a TRAC ticket on this issue here: http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1038 Carl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
