Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > I still think the con is valid--for instance I think wikipedia is > great but certainly have a lower expectation of trust when I read > stuff there. I think it would take a while to notice fishy entries in > a contributors wiki too. >
That is a good point. Some contributors, maybe, will have a full page, while others are not interested to promote themselves at all. > I like the idea of giving people edit access to a wiki when they > become contributors, and think this should be periodically (and > perhaps manually) copied over to a static page periodically. > Not only copied, but edited. Jaap --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
