Hello,

> > > On the BladeCenter, only one test failed after upgrading to 2.8.4:
>
> > > sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/rings/real_rqdf.pyx
> > > **********************************************************************
> > > File "real_rqdf.pyx", line 24:
> > >     sage: RQDF( 123.2) * RR (.543)
> > > Expected:
> > >     66.89760000000000624851281827432114309792736749325567465385058291
> > > Got:
> > >     NaN
> > > **********************************************************************
> > > 1 items had failures:
> > >    1 of   9 in __main__.example_0
> > > ***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
> > > For whitespace errors, see the file .doctest_real_rqdf.pyx
>

In addition to what William said:

- If you run "make check" with the mpfr spkg do all tests pass?
- The compiler is definitely a little long in the tooth, The is an
experimental gcc 4.2.1 spkg at sagemath.org. You could install that,
wipe out spkg/installed and rebuild Sage from scratch.
- What happens if you install a binary release of Sage? Does the
problem go away? Chances are with that crufty an install unless some
current libstdc++.so is around Sage 2.8.4[.1] won't run, especially on
x86-64. You probably are better of with building the experimental gcc
spkg. If you have any problems with that let me know.

Cheers,

Michael


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to